![]() This finding implies that context encoding is highly automatic for native listeners. Moreover, focal attention is not a prerequisite for extracting contextual cues from speech and nonspeech during perceptual normalization. It is apparent that for any considerably long sequences the number of possible paths through. Therefore, domain-specific processing of speech could be the most likely cause of the unequal context effect. The weighting function is used to normalize for the path length. ![]() This finding suggests that speech and nonspeech sounds are partly processed by domain-specific mechanisms and that information from the same domain can be integrated more effectively than that from different domains. The results reveal a prominent congruency effect-target sounds tend to be identified more accurately when embedded in contexts of the same nature (speech/nonspeech). To shed light on this issue, the present study compares the perception of lexical tones and their nonlinguistic counterparts under specific contextual (speech, nonspeech) and attentional (with/without focal attention) conditions. Some potential factors which may contribute to these unequal effects have been proposed but, thus far, their plausibility remains unclear. Speech contexts are usually more effective in improving lexical tone identification than nonspeech contexts matched in pitch information. If none of the above helps, you can send email to. There is a user group on the Internet: the Praat User List. Or consult the Frequently Asked Questions directly. If that does not help, use the Search button in Praat’s manual window. However, not all contexts are equally beneficial. Make sure you have read the Intro from Praat’s Help menu. Context is indispensable for accurate tone perception, especially when the target tone system is as complex as that of Cantonese.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |